Campaigns PETA.org
 
Get Active Campaigns Media Center TV Cruelty-Free Living Shop About PETA Donate Now
 
Subscribe to E-News
 
 
Search
Campaigns
Animals Used for Clothing
Animals Used for Entertainment
Animal Testing
Education
Companion Animals
Vegetarian/Vegan
Get Involved
Become a PETA Member
Intern at PETA
Join PETA's Activist Network
Report Cruelty to Animals
Subscribe to E-News
Support Our Work
Work for PETA

Animal Rights Uncompromised:
Predator-Reintroduction Programs

PETA does not support predator-reintroduction programs for myriad reasons. Animals can very often escape artificial boundaries and become a "nuisance," which means that they may end up getting poisoned, hit by cars, or shot. In failed attempts to escape, they might become entangled in barbed wire or be shocked by electric fences. Upon introduction to their new homes, their prey scatter and their lives and behavior patterns are turned upside-down. Wolves, bears, lynxes, and boars deserve to lead free, natural lives. Reintroduction programs subject wild animals to capturing and handling, which is always stressful for them, and may eventually put them in the line of fire of farmers who are already angry about predator-reintroduction programs.

To capture and transport wolves and other predators to a new area, the animals must first be tranquilized. When they recover from the anesthesia, they are released into unfamiliar terrain. This unnatural process causes stress to animals and threatens their physical health and well-being. Wolves are social animals who live in tightly knit packs. It is virtually impossible to capture and relocate an entire pack, so relocation almost always breaks up a tightly bonded extended family, likely causing loneliness, pining, separation anxiety, depression, and grieving. Relocated animals often have difficulty determining where they can find food and shelter. Some of the wolves who were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park have left their new packs because it is difficult to adapt to the new area and function in their contrived "family" units.

Reintroducing wolves and other predators into an environment that has been free of such animals for a long time is also traumatic for the animals who already live there, such as deer, birds, and any other animals who suddenly find themselves being stalked and eaten. While supporters of predator-reintroduction programs believe in the concept of restoring the "balance of nature," it's not possible to artificially impose this balance. Ecosystems are in a constant state of change, which has been sped up by human expansion and technological advances. Our species must take responsibility for wiping out predator populations in many areas of the world and must also realize that the system has evolved and recovered to its current state. Rather than attempting to return wilderness areas to some semblance of an undefined previous state and manipulating populations of animals, we need to focus our efforts on alleviating the suffering and promoting the well-being of those who are there now.

Many articles and news reports about the wolf-reintroduction program in the United States focused on people's interests—as if the absence of wolves makes us miss out on a majestic part of nature. Such reports romanticize hearing "the cry of wolves" one day again in Yellowstone but do not consider the extensive suffering involved in these cries.

Get additional information on living with wildlife.

Animals Are Not Ours to . . .
Eat
Wear
Experiment on
Use for Entertainment
More Information
Caged Birds
Chaining Dogs
Crating Dogs
Declawing Cats
Electric-Shock Training for Dogs
Euthanasia
Feral Cats
Life-Taking Charities
'No-Kill' Shelters
'Outdoor' Cats
PETA on 'Pets'
PETA's Tactics
Pit Bull Breeding Bans
Predator-Reintroduction Programs
'Responsible Breeders'
'Catch-and-Release' Fishing
Zoos
Why Animal Rights?

Printer-Friendly      l      E-Mail This Page      l      Subscribe to E-News   
Contact PETA      l      Privacy Policy      l      PETA Web Sites   
Click here to return to PETA.org